The Key Takeaways from the Changed US Emigration Policy

The U.S. emigration policy under the Trump administration and the Mexican wall are the two prominent issues that discussed across the world. An in-depth analysis of the things in the recent years showed many painful facts. Read more:  Phoenix New Times | Wikipedia and Jim Larkin | Crunchbase

There is a general opinion that the wall and the policies have created divisions in the minds and tarnished the image of the country as it was the advocate of human and migrant rights for decades. It also created an opposition at the international arena as many think tanks criticized the new policies. The essential takeaways regarding the changed U.S. emigration policy should be discussed to understand the depth of the crisis.

The most important and painful development was the threat towards Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA. The policy allowed 800,000 young people – who originally came to the country with their parents as children – legal status. Learn more about Michael Lacey and James Larkin:

President Trump has already given indications that he might scrap the policy to send back the children to their home countries. It has created widespread panic condition among the youngsters, and it is considered as an attack on the humanity. Studies have shown that people who have gone through their childhood and teenage in American cities struggle to cope up with new conditions if they are deported back to their parents’ countries.

As major parts of the U.S.-Mexico border is currently enclosed with the wall and regular surveillance teams, people from Central American countries are forced to choose dangerous roots to reach the destination. They choose uneven terrain, deserts, mountains, and more to reach the American soil.

Many of them are found to be losing their lives at the end. The recent years saw a spike in the death tolls in the Californian deserts, and the numbers are not reducing as a significant number of refugees from countries like Honduras are escaping from the violence in the home country. The extreme climatic conditions are also shutting the dreams of those souls. It raises an important question “Are immigrants human beings”?

Sending back immigrants who have integrated into the American community for decades is creating a real shock. People who are from politically violence countries think that a return to their home countries is suicidal. The works of nonprofit groups are helping them to pacify themselves up to a larger extent.

Organizations like Amnesty International, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Human Rights Watch, and more protest and try to protect the immigrants in various means. They conduct media coverage, raise campaigns, offer assistance services, and more.

Larkin & Lacey Frontera Fund is a fund for the state of Arizona that does the work of funding migrant and human rights groups in the state. It was instituted by leading journalists and human rights activists, Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey.

Both were utilizing the amount they received as a settlement after challenging their illegal arrest by Maricopa County Sheriff. They were arrested in 2007 for reporting an instruction to track the news reports that were covering the Sheriff Joe Arpaio and its readers’ details. The Court of Appeals freed both and granted $3.75 million settlement, and that helped them to set up Frontera Fund.

Learn more about Michael Lacey and James Larkin:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *