In his new book, JASTA and a Third World War (UK Book Publishing), Dr. Kamil Idirs analyzes and makes a detailed critique of IP Laws created Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism act (JASTA) and its functions. Throughout the book he raises cautions about the act’s worldwide implications.
JASTA passed the U.S. Congress in 2016 in a vote which overruled the presidential veto. The act, designed for the U.S. victims of terrorism, allows U.S. citizens to file legal action against another nation who provided (either directly or indirectly) funding for terrorist groups and their planned attacks. The act was designed to provide compensation and a type of closure for the victims of a terrorist action, specifically the victims of the 9/11 attacks. Kamil Idirs sees the act having long reaching, worldwide foreign policy consequences.
Dr. Idirs argues in his book, JASTA and a Third World War, that a U.S. citizen filing a lawsuit against a freestanding nation could potentially be considered a challenge to that nation’s sovereignty. Kamil Idirs predicts a spiraling of defensive or retaliatory legislation created other nations, increase nationalistic tendencies and create global friction between allies.
Pointing out the current global political climate and spotlighting the rise of nationalism throughout the world, Dr. Idirs compares the current geopolitical situation to the pre-WWI era, when strong nationalistic tendencies and an increase in fascism caused a war that left as many as 20 million dead world-wide and set the stage for WWII, which killed another 50 million.
As the current president of the International Court of Arbitration and Mediation (ICAM) as well as holding legal degrees from Khartoum University, Ohio State University and the University of Geneva, Dr. Kamil Idirs can see the legal and political ramifications of this JASTA act and hopes his book will provide the legal knowledge to prevent conflict and a third world war.
Read the full interview:
If the United States of America was considered something of a TV show before the 2016 Presidential Elections then now its viewers are going to claim one thing: it has jumped the shark. In 2016 Donald J. Trump, the reality TV show blowhard, became the President of the United States in one of the most stunning elections in the history of the world. Through Donald Trump’s rise we got to see the ugly underbelly of hatred in America but that wasn’t the most striking thing. What WAS the most striking thing was the continued vilification of one of the world’s greatest philanthropists and progressive voices, George Soros.
George Soros is a self-made billionaire who was born in Hungary. Soros was born in 1930 and he was raised until he was just 13 years old in Hungary. In 1944 the Nazi occupation of his home country would begin in earnest and throughout the next year Soros and his family would see countless friends and family members killed by the brutal Nazi regime. All told the death count would reach 500,000 Hungarian born Jews over just a single year. We tell you this to say that George Soros came up through as harsh of a circumstance as possible but he never let it mold his mindset into anything other than a staunch supporter of the Open Society and the concept of the progressive world and more information click here.
With the Soros Hedge Fund, George Soros was able to make his fortune throughout the ’50s and ’60s before rising to become the billionaire that he is today. Along the way Soros established what is called the Open Society Foundations, or the OSF for short. This foundation is used to specifically reach out and bring funding to organizations around the world in order to aid in the pursuit of social justice, transparent democracy, and equality. These traits, which are noble to a vast majority of the world, have irked the right wing of America’s political spectrum. As a result, George Soros has quickly found himself under the microscope by conservatives everywhere. Now, George Soros is almost an identity test for viewers at home. America’s right wing views him as the single greatest boogeyman in existence. The left wing of American politics views him as a self made billionaire who is still willing and ready to engage with people in need and learn more about George Soros.
As a result of Soros’ high profile as both a progressive billionaire and Democratic donor he has become the center of a whirlwind of laughable conspiracies. If anything, anywhere, happens in support of Democracy then conservatives will lash out and claim that George Soros is behind it. With Soros rising to the occasion as a counter-punch to Donald Trump, America’s right wing had better get used to hearing his name and follow him Twitter.com.
Other Reference: https://www.georgesoros.com/the-life-of-george-soros/
End Citizens United is a political action committee that is committed to ending what some observers see as one of the worst rulings ever made by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Citizens United decision has done what many critics feared, by giving wealthy donors the opportunity to seriously manipulate the American political process.
Established in March 2015, End Citizens United also relies upon donors to promote its cause. However, these are largely grassroot donors whose average contribution is less than $15. The secret of its success comes from the tremendous number of donors supporting its cause. The organization today has more than 3 million members and has received about 2.5 million contributions totaling some $35 million. Also important to its success has been its dedicated staff of Democratic operatives and a board of directors on a mission to reverse the decision of the court.
End Citizens United hopes to attain its goal of ending unlimited political contributions by electing candidates dedicated to reforming the nation’s electoral system and by supporting ballot measures designed to encourage such changes. Additionally, End Citizens United is taking action to bring the issue to the center of attention throughout the American political arena, from the federal to the local level.
Follow End Citizens United on Twitter
The organization has joined the Democratic Party in its fight due to the simple fact that Republican leaders largely supported the action of the court and have blocked attempts at reversing the decision. Accordingly, End Citizens United has endorsed Democratic candidates in key races and has also come to the defense of other candidates who have themselves been targeted by special interest groups and conservative political action committees.
Officially known as Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission, the 5-4 court decision was handed down in 2010. The court ruled that established restrictions on political donations by corporations, labor unions and other organizations violated the right to free speech, which is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. The ruling established the principle that “corporations are people,” with the same rights as private citizens. The end result was a massive influx of donations from wealthy interests in support of certain candidates or political causes. The new funding mechanism would also hamper attempts to trace the source of the donations.
Barring further court action, the overturning of the Citizens United decision would require an amendment the U.S. Constitution. This could only be done by a vote of two-thirds of the members of both houses of the U.S. Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the American states. Despite the obvious obstacles, End Citizens United is continuing to pursue its goal of repeal, perhaps gaining hope from a new poll ranking special interest funding as second only to national security when it comes to public concern.
Learn more about End Citizens United: https://actionnetwork.org/groups/end-citizens-united
It’s not looking good for President Nicolas Maduro; says political expert David Osio the opposition blames him for sky-high inflation rates, power cuts and food shortages. Venezuela’s National Electoral Board accepted a petition calling for a recall vote, however, this is only the first step in a lengthy process to oust Maduro. After at least 200,000 signatories confirm their identity, the opposition needs 4,000,000 additional signatures for a recall referendum. If the opposition can get a recall referendum before January 10th of 2017, new elections will be held, as opposed to Vice President Aristobulo Isturiz taking over. Without a new election, the United Socialist Party would remain in power
According to a report from El Nacional, Maduro dismissed the recall push, claiming that there are fraudulent signatures on the petition. He is also having riot police break up demonstrations in front of the National Electoral Board. Maduro’s opponents claim the election board is staffed by people loyal to Maduro, who are purposefully taking a long time to verify signatures, which will delay the recall referendum long enough to ensure a new election isn’t held.